See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil

This idea came from OCR
Get three volunteers from the class. They will sit at the front relatively far apart from each other. One of them will be blindfolded and will be ‘See no evil’, the other will have headphones on listening to music (at a reasonable volume but not enough to damage their hearing!) and be ‘Hear no evil’ and the other will not be allowed to speak and be ‘Speak no evil’. You each give them one piece of information from one square on Activity Sheet 4. You also inform ‘Speak no evil’ of what variable they need to find out. You give them a time limit of 5 minutes to communicate with each other all the pieces of information and they have to have a correct answer. This is a fun, end of topic activity that can be very entertaining to watch. The key is to use the whiteboards. The student who cannot see can speak and hear and similarly for the other students and their other senses. Students have to figure out a strategy to communicate their ideas to each other effectively. Remember they can write messages on their whiteboards which is crucial for the student who cannot hear or speak! You may want to do an example first. Students not involved should have access to the information you have given them and be encouraged to calculate the answer themselves. In fact you could make the rest of the class the judge of whether the particular group has succeeded in their task.

Thoughts
- students have to work as a team
- all students in team have to be involved for it to work
- what are other students in the class doing?
- does this have more impact than practising questions normally in groups?

Possible Adaptations
Although this might take a little while to explain the first time, it could be used again with other topics in small groups, where each of the roles (including teacher giving information) is taken by a set of 4 students, so all students are involved.

Mastery Assessment Idea

There was a lot of discussion on the UKMT course about the Mastery scheme of learning - I thought this idea was interesting for mastery assessment for year 7...

The Scheme of Learning is divided into 4 sections

• introduction
• shallow
• deep
• profound / mastery

And the assessment is given in exactly the same format, as shown above (sample of a double-page spread).

All students across the year sit the same test in the same time limit.

Students do whichever questions they think they can do, for example a mid set might aim to do all of columns 1 and 2, then go back and try some of column 3.

A top set might be expected to complete all columns on the paper.

I like that all students may attempt questions, for example a mid-set student if very confident with area could attempt column 4, but then perhaps might only be able to do column 1 on fractions.

Assessment scores could be a stumbling block here - you couldn't give a straight % as the lower sets would likely be very despondent with their results. We discussed the idea of normalising each set to the top mark, in the same way that some university exams are done.

Food for thought!

#10minwin: Flipped Learning Teamwork

I really loved the idea (seen here) of students getting lots of video input from different sources and then sharing it in the classroom, so I'm going to embed this into the Flipped Learning course I'm running for the M1 module of A Level Maths.

Students sit on tables of 4, so each person in the group will select a different video to watch in advance of the lesson.
The following lesson, they will then feed back to their peers and if all goes well have all the knowledge required!

Most students have really enjoyed being in control of their knowledge learning pace by using the flipped classroom this year, so this activity should hopefully tackle the "you can't force me to watch the video before the lesson" as this time they'll be letting down their group and friends if it's not done.

File template can be found here.

#10minwin Daily Nuggets

At the end of each session on the OTP course, we wrote a "nugget" of the idea that we were going to takeaway from the day. I loved this idea, because you get bombarded with so many good ideas on the best courses that it's hard to know what to try or implement first.

I figured students must be the same, so we've started the daily nugget, where each day one student is responsible for recording the "nugget" of information that is most important.

We're keeping this on a poster in the classroom, so they can be perused anytime, and will also make a revision starting point when we get closer to exams.

The template for this can be found here.

UPDATE: slightly different version for Year 12...

#10minwin: Speed Mathing

A lot of what we do at GCSE level is recapping knowledge that at least some students already have, so the idea behind this is

"the knowledge is in the room"

(thanks to James Wise & Simon Thompson for this!)

Each student was given some information about a unit conversion, from which they had to come up with a problem and write it on a post-it.

Students then arranged their chairs in two rows (they were surprisingly efficient at doing this!), and they had one minute to ask a question, including how to apply any conversion facts they were given.

These are a few of the question which have been collated and will form part of a procedural revision bank for later in the year.

We'll also be doing this tomorrow to recap angle rules, where each table will be given an angle fact as well as some examples and non-examples, then will speed math to share it.

The goal is a much higher engagement in the learning than recapping as a whole class.

Manglish: Comprehension in Worded Maths Questions

With the GCSE Numeracy a little over 4 months away, we're really focussing on honing Year 10's problem solving skills. Here's a lesson I did last week to work on just that.

Starter
As usual, on the board as they came in. My goal here - productive panic. Students had become a little overconfident in how prepared they are for the exam, so I needed them to feel what it would be like if the exam was tomorrow, in the panic zone.

We then reflected on feelings: too hard, panic, didn't know what a frustum was etc. This was the motivation for the lesson, they now knew why it was that we needed to revisit the IMCA model that we'd started the year with.

IMCA Model
Next they were given the template below, same question but guiding them through each aspect of IMCA. After a discussion with the English dept, some comprehension style questions were given for Information.


Methods were given to choose from, with the idea of there being some red herrings in, e.g. if the question was about circumference, area was also an option.

- PAUSE -

Students were only allowed to answer these first 2 sections, and this was done in silence. Only at this point were they allowed to collaborate to do the calculations, though most chose to carry on independently.

Here we really emphasised that before writing the answer, they should revisit the "what is the question" in the information section to make sure they were actually answering it!

Reflection
Pupils now felt more confident again, they were back in their comfort zone. I asked for feedback on the model, to which I had a fantastic response:
"I feel really confident answering these questions when there is guidance, but in an exam I could never think of this myself."
This led neatly on into the second phase... creating the scaffolding.

Phase 2
Students worked in pairs on an unseen problem (each pair had a different problem) to create scaffolding similar to what I had given them for the first phase. This enabled them to really think about what the important information was so they could ask questions about it. They were also great at being mean and choosing really similar topics for the methods section which weren't quite right!

Phase 3
Quick task, which involved swapping with another pair, and using their scaffolding for guidance.

Plenary
We agreed that they would become better at coming up with the questions if they had more practice, so that's exactly what we'll do! We also agreed that the end goal was for the template to become internal, so they were self questioning rather than peer questioning.



Resources can be found here.